Paper: | PS-2B.31 | ||
Session: | Poster Session 2B | ||
Location: | H Fläche 1.OG | ||
Session Time: | Sunday, September 15, 17:15 - 20:15 | ||
Presentation Time: | Sunday, September 15, 17:15 - 20:15 | ||
Presentation: | Poster | ||
Publication: | 2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience, 13-16 September 2019, Berlin, Germany | ||
Paper Title: | Risk Sensitivity under Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes | ||
Manuscript: | Click here to view manuscript | ||
License: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. |
||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.32470/CCN.2019.1160-0 | ||
Authors: | Nikolas Höft, Rong Guo, Vaios Laschos, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany; Sein Jeung, Dirk Ostwald, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Klaus Obermayer, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany | ||
Abstract: | Many real-life decisions must be made in the face of risk that is due to uncertain information about the environment. Even facing the same environment, different people might behave differently due to their individual risk preferences. For instance, a risk-seeking gambler may overestimate the chance of favorable outcomes or the amount of money going to win in those cases and therefore prefers to gamble. In cognitive neuroscience, Bayesian inference is usually applied to model the objective perception of the unobservable state, under which risk-neutral decisions are made by solving a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). However, the subjective evaluation of such inferred state information, which leads to different individual risk preferences, and the underlying neurobiological process are still poorly understood. Hence, we derived a risk-sensitive POMDP method that models human choice behavior and response time in a simulated investment task. Our risk-sensitive POMDP model fits the experimental data considerably better than the risk-neutral model. The model’s risk-sensitivity parameters explained subjects’ individual risk preference under state uncertainty at the decision time. Our results may pave the way for understanding human risk-sensitive choice under perceptual uncertainty using a unified quantitative POMDP framework. |