Paper: | PS-2A.66 | ||
Session: | Poster Session 2A | ||
Location: | H Lichthof | ||
Session Time: | Sunday, September 15, 17:15 - 20:15 | ||
Presentation Time: | Sunday, September 15, 17:15 - 20:15 | ||
Presentation: | Poster | ||
Publication: | 2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience, 13-16 September 2019, Berlin, Germany | ||
Paper Title: | Understanding the functional and structural differences across excitatory and inhibitory neurons | ||
Manuscript: | Click here to view manuscript | ||
License: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. |
||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.32470/CCN.2019.1265-0 | ||
Authors: | Sun Minni, Peking University, China; Li Ji-An, University of Science and Technology of China, China; Theodore Moskovitz, Grace Lindsay, Kenneth Miller, Mario Dipoppa, Guangyu Robert Yang, Columbia University, China | ||
Abstract: | One of the most fundamental organizational principles of the brain is the separation of excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neurons. In addition to their opposing effects on post-synaptic neurons, E and I cells tend to differ in their selectivity and connectivity. Although many such differences have been characterized experimentally, it is not clear why they exist in the first place. We studied this question in an artificial neural network equipped with multiple E and I cell types. We found that a deep convolutional recurrent network trained to perform an object classification task was able to capture salient distinctions between E and I neurons. We explored the necessary conditions for the network to develop distinct selectivity and connectivity across cell types. We found that neurons that project to higher-order areas will have greater stimulus selectivity, regardless of whether they are excitatory or not. Sparser connectivity is required for higher selectivity, but only when the recurrent connections are excitatory. These findings demonstrate that the differences observed across E and I neurons are not independent, and can be explained using a smaller number of factors. |